i interpret it as this: all [ usage x > usage y || fun_to_talk_about x > fun_to_talk_about y | let lang=[minBound .. maxBound] -- C++,Haskell,Java,etc. , x<-lang , y<-lang , irc_channel_users x > irc_channel_users y ] - marc Am Dienstag, 21. August 2007 schrieb Albert Y. C. Lai:
Andrew Coppin wrote:
...does this mean Haskell is officially harder to understand than Lisp, Java, Perl and O'Caml? :-}
(OTOH, does this mean Haskell is easier to understand than PHP or C++?)
Or, Haskell is the easiest to understand of them all.
Reason: Extremely large channel means so hard to understand that many people want help. Extremely small channel means so hard to understand that few people show interest. The middle-sized channel sits at the sweet spot.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe