10 Jul
2013
10 Jul
'13
8:11 p.m.
Michael Snoyman <michael@snoyman.com> wrote:
Any thoughts on this? I'm not sure exactly what would be the right method to add to the Exception typeclass, but if we can come to consensus on that and there are no major objections to my separate package proposal, I think this would be something moving forward on, including a library proposal.
Just a minor note: Add both `hasTag` and `tagsOf` to the type class, because `hasTag` may use something much more efficient than `elem` like pattern matching or `Data.Set.member`. I'm not even sure we really need `tagsOf`. Greets, Ertugrul -- Key-ID: E5DD8D11 "Ertugrul Soeylemez <es@ertes.de>" FPrint: BD28 3E3F BE63 BADD 4157 9134 D56A 37FA E5DD 8D11 Keysrv: hkp://subkeys.pgp.net/