20 May
2014
20 May
'14
9:49 a.m.
On Tue, 20 May 2014 15:39:45 +0200, silvio
Your email is on the assertion-heavy side. Would you reconsider restating your case?
1) >>= flip is ugly
2) you can't use >>= in an if condition
3) or imagine you want to fill it in some 3-tuple or a record type.
4) res <- fmap pureFunction ioFunction === let res = pureFunction { ioFunction}
There are tons of cases that we have solved with complicated combinations of operators and functions that could be displayed much clearer with this notation.
Are we reinventing idiom brackets here?