
29 Aug
2011
29 Aug
'11
6:16 a.m.
Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:08, Michael Snoyman
wrote: So one possible solution is to just add an option to never decompress response bodies, but that's a bit of a hack. The real question is: what's the correct way to handle these tarballs? Web browsers seem to know not to decompress them, but AFAICT http-enumerator is correctly following the spec by decompressing. Another possibility is to
"Seem to" is pretty much correct; it took years for some browsers to reliably handle them correctly. (Anyone else remember Mozilla saving compressed tarballs uncompressed?)
Yes, it was a pain in the neck. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/