That is a good idea! If I implement head, tail, take drop operations, I can use my KMP implementation out of the box... On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 11:10, Nicolas Pouillard < nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com> wrote:
I am doing the ICFPC07 task right now, to learn Haskell and tried to use
Excerpts from Rafael Gustavo da Cunha Pereira Pinto's message of Sat Sep 20 12:54:26 +0200 2008: the
Sequence, but the final code is too damn slow (a few iterations per minute!).
Is your structure a sequence of *Char*s, if so you should consider to use a sequence of strict bytestrings of a given size (chunks).
The DNA needs only 2 operations: head (or take) and concat.
I am thinking in using ropes for the DNA and sequences for all the rest (patterns, templates and RNA).
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 23:15, Ryan Ingram
wrote: I think Data.Sequence uses fingertrees which are pretty fast.
I used a handgrown rope-like structure for ICFPC07 but I wish I had known about Sequence; it would have likely just been better.
-- ryan
2008/9/19 Rafael Gustavo da Cunha Pereira Pinto < RafaelGCPP.Linux@gmail.com>:
Hi all,
Is there any implementation of the rope data structure in Haskell?
I couldn't find any on Hackage, and I am intending to implement it.
Regards,
Rafael Gustavo da Cunha Pereira Pinto Electronic Engineer, MSc.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-- Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai
-- Rafael Gustavo da Cunha Pereira Pinto Electronic Engineer, MSc.