12 Mar
2008
12 Mar
'08
3:32 p.m.
On Mar 12, 2008, at 14:17 , Donn Cave wrote:
Sure. It isn't a lot of code, so I subjected it to Either-ization as an experiment, and I did indeed take the monad procedural route.
Monad != procedural, unless you insist on do notation. Think of it as composition (it may be easier to use (=<<) which "points the same direction" as (.)). -- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH