Re: [Haskell-cafe] about Haskell code written to be "too smart"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Manlio Perillo wrote: | But this may be really a question of personal taste or experience. | What is more "natural"? | | 1) pattern matching | 2) recursion | or | 1) function composition | 2) high level functions Definitely the latter two. They are easier to comprehend (assuming each of the smaller abstractions are already internalized) and more efficient. Arguably, this building-block approach is the whole *point* of Haskell. - - Jake -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknJXDwACgkQye5hVyvIUKl/VQCgwspG1HDiGNwEQUFA/Wus6GYD GkkAnRpiP50p17S8Pa9CEvxMFz4cDiZF =/Gi/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----