12 Feb
2008
12 Feb
'08
3:10 a.m.
Don Stewart
Shall we merge nano-md5 into this lib, and deprecate nano-md5 itself? Seems like a good time to consolidate, and produce a single openssl binding.
It's tempting, but I would really hate to lose nano-md5 as it is today. I thought your concept was a great idea to inspire people to start small to get a feel for developing Haskell libraries. The current nano-md5 serves as a really good example. In the Ruby community there are many small libraries that do one, simple focused task. There are times when this is a virtue over libraries that try to be all encompassing. It's weird but I would have thought the Haskell community would have more embraced small libraries also since they may be more composable. - Hitesh