Daniel Fischer
On Friday 02 July 2010 22:32:37, Nils Schweinsberg wrote:
On 02.07.2010 20:05, Jason Dagit wrote:
In other words, don't be shy!
Ok, thanks for the reply! :) However, a question about haddock:
evalMState :: Forkable m => MState t m a -- ^ Action to evaluate -> t -- ^ Initial state value -> m a
This (and run-/execMState) gets rendered incorrectly. "Action to evaluate" is completly lost and "Initial state value" has moved one upwards to the "MState t m a". Is that a haddock bug or my fault?
Probably Haddock's fault. It had that bug for a while.
It's been fixed in the 2.7 release apparently (I haven't upgraded, so I haven't checked that myself). -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com