[Haskell-cafe] Hugs Was: Rewriting a famous library and using the same name: pros and cons

3 Jul 2010

      Hi,

Am Samstag, den 03.07.2010, 23:18 +1000 schrieb Ivan Lazar Miljenovic:
...
Stephen Tetley  writes:
...
I think it was Hugs compliant as least for some revisions - I seem to
remember looking at it before I switched to GHC.
People still use Hugs? :p
A bit more seriously: is there any listing anywhere of which extensions
Hugs supports?
I’d also be interested in the answer to this. Debian has basically
stopped building hugs packages of hackage libraries, but hugs is still
provided on Debian – though I haven’t heared of any users of it for a
while.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

[Haskell-cafe] Hugs Was: Rewriting a famous library and using the same name: pros and cons

Joachim Breitner