
22 Sep
2007
22 Sep
'07
7:09 a.m.
Peter Verswyvelen:
Personally I also find the following a good explanation, since it does not introduce lambdas or other scary things for newbies.
f . g = composite where composite x = f (g x)
I suppose that the usual definition, which is (f . g) x = f (g x), is clear enough. No lambdas to be scared of here.