20 Sep
2005
20 Sep
'05
10:20 a.m.
John Goerzen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 03:05:25PM +0100, Keean Schupke wrote:
strace seems to say yes.
Thats odd, the source code seems to suggest that when you read past the end of the buffer it reads the next entire buffer (it has cases for each possible buffer configuration, line, block and none) - and I can think of no reason _why_ it cannot use buffering... I would think that it's a bug if it is the case.
Because the next entire buffer might consume more data than the remote has sent. That results in deadlock.
Would it not be usual to have a timeout incase of dropped connection? Regards, Keean. (Btw, did you look at the Parser Monad-Transformer?)