Hello Pierre, On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 09:54:11AM +0000, Pierre_van_der_Laar (Functional Account) via Haskell-Cafe wrote:
So the problem is real and seems to be underestimated by the Haskell user community based on the many (partly) incorrect responses on this mailing list. I still would like to know what GHC's strategy is to tackle this problem!
Could you please answer Stefan Monnier's question? On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 11:23:30AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I think you're confusing the GPL and the LGPL here. Otherwise, please clarify what you mean by "enforces a LGPL license on my code".
The authentic interpretation [1] by the FSF itself seems pretty clear: "If you statically link against an LGPLed library, you must also provide your application in an object (not necessarily source) format, so that a user has the opportunity to modify the library and relink the application." [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LGPLStaticVsDynamic