You'll probably get a lot of different answers. I think the major difference is the notion of encapsulation used by each. Haskell has type classes and O'Caml has structures/functors and (OO) classes. I personally find type class much nicer. Additionally, I think Haskell's syntax is easier on the eyes and the libraries are much more well established. That said, I use O'Caml for all of my non-Perl coding. Why? Because I need lots of arrays and though Haskell does support them, the lack of syntactic sugar makes it very inconvenient. Second, lack of loop support, which I can live without. Finally, it's slower. I would forgive the last (it can be made faster if you use unboxed arrays and so on) if the first two were fixed. (Of course, which is better depends strongly on your application. I do a lot of statistical machine learning stuff, which requires processing of huge arrays and matrices, lots of loops and lots of funny math calculations.) On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Hi all,
Okay, I've been studying Haskell for a few days and I think I have a feel for the language. I completted a course, and wrote a Revers Polish Notation calculator.
Now that I sort of understand Haskell, I was hoping someone could give me an opinion on OCaml from a Haskell POV. Both are functional and have fairly clear syntax. OCaml is supposed to be very fast, and Haskell perhaps is not. Besides that, what else could you say about them? What would make someone prefer one over the other?
Any thoughts, opinions and comments would be most appreciated.
Thanks!
Cheers, Daniel.
-- Hal Daume III | hdaume@isi.edu "Arrest this man, he talks in maths." | www.isi.edu/~hdaume