8 Jan
2010
8 Jan
'10
3:11 p.m.
Will Ness
That might be why Daniel's structure is better: it plunges down faster than mine.
"treefold" structure was: (2+4) + ( (4+8) + ( (8+16) + ( (16+32) + ( (32+64) + ....... )))) dpths: 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8
this should of course have been dpths: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
daniel's: (2+(4+6)) + ( (8+(10+12)) + ( (14+(16+18)) + ( (20+(22+24)) + .... )) 3 5 5.4 6 7.8 7.9 8 9 9.5 9.6 10.7 10.8
hmm. :|