27 Jun
2013
27 Jun
'13
10:24 p.m.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Marc Weber
Excerpts from David Fox's message of Fri Jun 28 04:04:59 +0200 2013:
So you will get modules Start.A, Start.B and Start.C. If there are
But that's very unlikly what the programmer wants. I mean I might want Types and Funs as module names, move A,B to Types, C to Funs.
I agree that I could reach my goal using a "merge" afterwards ?
From what I'm reading, I don't actually agree that the goal may be reached by using a merge afterwards. I assume that split-then-merge isn't the same as identity since at very least the order of the symbols is lost.
-- Felipe.