On 9/12/12 5:37 PM, Francesco Mazzoli wrote:
At Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:04:31 -0300, Eric Velten de Melo wrote:
It would be really awesome, though, if it were possible to use a parser written in Parsec with this, in the spirit of avoiding code rewriting and enhancing expressivity and abstraction.
There is http://hackage.haskell.org/package/attoparsec-conduit and http://hackage.haskell.org/package/attoparsec-enumerator, which turn attoparsec parsers into enumerators/conduits, and http://hackage.haskell.org/package/attoparsec-parsec, which is a compatibility layer between attoaparsec and parsec. Good luck :).
Not to mention attoparsec-iteratee, for the iteratee minded folks: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/attoparsec-iteratee -- Live well, ~wren