Re: [Haskell-cafe] Manual type-checking in graphs: Avoidable?

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 03:07:59PM +0300, Kosyrev Serge wrote:

Tom Ellis writes:

...

I agree. FGL seems inappropriate to model people owning hamsters because you genuinely want to reflect the difference between people and hamsters by having two different node types.

What would you propose instead?

If I were utterly insane I would propose that FGL be extended with higher-typed indexes, so instead of Gr :: * -> * -> * we would have Gr :: (k -> *) -> (k -> k -> *) -> * Then Hamster and Person would be the only inhabitants of some kind k, and you can could choose two different types to represent them, and four different types to represent the (directed) edges between them. I would guess that most of the FGL implementation would carry over to this setting with no change to its structure. However, unless Jeffrey has a hard requirement to use something FGL-like, Johannes and Andrew's suggestions will probably be fine. Tom