Well, happy lists CPP as extensions so maybe adding: -pgmP "$pgmgcc -E -undef -traditional" helps. C. Am 10.02.2011 16:53, schrieb Dušan Kolář:
I have the following ghc script:
cat ghc #!/bin/sh exedir="/usr/local/lib/ghc-6.12i386/lib/ghc-6.12.3" exeprog="ghc-stage2" executablename="$exedir/$exeprog" datadir="/usr/local/lib/ghc-6.12i386/share" bindir="/usr/local/lib/ghc-6.12i386/bin" topdir="/usr/local/lib/ghc-6.12i386/lib/ghc-6.12.3" pgmgcc="/usr/local/bin/gcc" executablename="$exedir/ghc" exec "$executablename" -B"$topdir" -pgmc "$pgmgcc" -pgml "$pgmgcc" -pgma "$pgmgcc" ${1+"$@"}
Dušan
On 02/10/2011 04:38 PM, Christian Maeder wrote:
Am 10.02.2011 13:15, schrieb Dušan Kolář:
Well, that was probably the main problem :-(
Unfortunately, even if, after performing all the stuff once again, I made platform configured, make ended in compilation of happy with "old story":
Configuring happy-1.18.5... "./Setup" "build" Preprocessing executables for happy-1.18.5... Building happy-1.18.5... ghc: could not execute: /usr/bin/gcc
Error: Building the happy-1.18.5 package failed make: *** [build.stamp] Error 2 Maybe this time indeed gcc is called as linker and you should add -pgml /usr/local/bin/gcc
In fact my ghc script for ghc-7.0.1 contains:
pgmgcc="/usr/bin/gcc" executablename="$exedir/ghc" exec "$executablename" -B"$topdir" -pgmc "$pgmgcc" -pgma "$pgmgcc" -pgml "$pgmgcc" -pgmP "$pgmgcc -E -undef -traditional" ${1+"$@"}
Christian
Even if all other items went OK, until happy :-( and it is called happy ;-) :-D
Dusan