Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is this haskelly enough?

On Jul 17, 2007, at 10:13 PM, Tony Morris wrote:

David F. Place wrote:

...

The use of >>= is just an obscure way of saying (flip concatMap).

Correction. The use of >>= is a more general way of saying (flip concatMap).

Tony Morris

Yes, but that generality is entirely wasted here and thus an obscuring element. There is no way that this function can be generalized to work with other monads. ___________________ (---o-------o-o-o---o-o-o----( David F. Place mailto:d@vidplace.com