Yeah, especially since a takeover does require actually documenting you’ve
made real efforts to reach the maintainer / last person to do a package
upload.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:41 AM Hécate
I think you shouldn't reasonably fear a takeover demand on the mailing-list if you don't disappear for years without a clear successor.
Le 12/03/2021 à 12:36, Henning Thielemann a écrit :
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, amindfv--- via Haskell-Cafe wrote:
Again, trying to be respectful here, but "burning" kinda does imply "fire," and "need" certainly does imply "need." It's now seeming more just like a desire for the package name.
I have nothing to do with 'toml' but the many takeover requests in the recent past make me nervous that if I am away from Haskell programming for some weeks or months brings me in danger of losing my packages. Btw. for some years I was not subscribed to Haskell Cafe because of high traffic and I would have missed such takeover request. I think the preference should be to create a fork.
Tom, could you please add a Maintainer field at hackage/toml via the Hackage revision feature? _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
-- Hécate ✨ 🐦: @TechnoEmpress IRC: Uniaika WWW: https://glitchbra.in RUN: BSD
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.