7 Sep
2006
7 Sep
'06
2:01 p.m.
Bertram Felgenhauer wrote:
I can't comment on why Bulat doesn't like negative numbers.
Neither it seems, did the original Haskell committee - that's why we have to muddle along with a confusing unary minus operator instead of proper negative literals - see the thread beginning http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2006-August/017410.html for the latest exciting attempt to get rid of unary minus... ;-) Regards, Brian. -- "Man simply could not have the right interest in beauty if in his life of soul he were not entangled in a world of hideously ugly spider-like beings." - Rudolf Steiner 16/12/1922