What reasons do people have to use a BSD license over a Public Domain license, for example with the license text from: <http://www.lemur.com/pd-disclaimers.html
? Is the only difference that, with a BSD license, the copyright notice must be maintained?
I've heard rumors that you can't license your code as public domain in some countries. Not sure if the BSD3 helps with that though. But, one reason I license my Haskell code as BSD3 is that GHC and most(?) of the libraries on hackage are BSD3. And the BSD3 license is very widely known. As a result, I don't expect to have to deal with licensing issues. If I used a different license, then people would have to wonder... even if the license was more liberal. I figure people want to code, not think about licenses :p Also, I think it is kind of rude/conceited to license my code as GPL when it builds on so much BSD3 code. As if my code is some how so much better that the BSD3 isn't good enough for it :p - jeremy