25 Apr
2014
25 Apr
'14
2:54 a.m.
On 2014年04月25日 15:34, Niklas Haas wrote:
FWIW, python's support for Unicode in its standard library is significantly better than Haskell's. Haskell fails on basic functions such as ‘toUpper’, ‘length’ or ‘==’.
I have to humbly disagree. Python does indeed have great Unicode support, but using Unicode for everything is not efficient in cases where it is not needed. With Haskell, one can use bytestring [1] and text [2] as necessary to have more control over how content is processed. Both packages are in Haskell Platform, the equivalent of Python's standard library. Cheers, Travis ---- [1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/bytestring [2] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/text