13 Jul
2006
13 Jul
'06
7:07 p.m.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 04:08:02PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
I believe that it the simplest way for programmer. But is that the best way for users? i want to make building/installation as simple as possible using Cabal infrastructure. is it possible that some box will have Cabal, but not hsc2hs installed?
hsc2hs should always be installed. it is absolutly needed to write portable libraries because you can't hard-code c constants or types in your files and expect them to compile on different systems. it would be nice if these compiler independent tools hsc2hs, runhaskell, cabal-install could be split off into their own project independent of any particular compiler. John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈