Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:31 +0100, "Daniel Fischer"
Am Mittwoch 17 Februar 2010 12:17:10 schrieb Jeremy O'Donoghue:
You're probably correct about the dependencies. I have never tried to compile wxHaskell against GHC 6.12.1 [snip]
Beating a dead horse, but today I decided to see whether I could install wxHaskell, all it took was a few edits in some .cabal files and one in wxcore's Setup to make it all build with 6.12.1. Still, it's annoying because you have to unpack everything, edit and cabal install in the unpacked directories.
Now since I did that, I could upload new verxions of wxdirect, wxcore and wx to hackage, so others could do a simple cabal install wx.
Thanks for doing this: it's great news for everyone who is on GHC 6.12.x.
But I would only do that if I get a go-ahead from somebody authorised (since Jeremy uploaded the previous versions, he'd be qualified, I think).
You're right - I'm probably as qualified as anyone! I've found that if a Cabal build works for one person, it's pretty reliable for all (this is one of the joys of Cabal and (to a lesser extent) the Haskell Platform. I'm quite happy for you to upload updates to Cabal. I'll pull them next week and make sure that they get merged to the wxHaskell darcs repo. If there are any reports of issues with the uploaded version (which I doubt) I'll look into them, so you're not taking on any long-term support burden.
Or I could send the edits to Jeremy and let him do the uploading, whatever is preferred.
I have no strong preference - the only thing I want to be sure of is that the darcs repo stays closely in sync with whatever is in Cabal. If you are OK with doing the upload, that's great. Otherwise I'll be very happy to do it based on your patches. Best regards Jeremy -- Jeremy O'Donoghue jeremy.odonoghue@gmail.com