On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 01:46:38AM +0000, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:48:09PM -0500, Isaac Dupree wrote:
Trying to implement literate haskell[*], I realized several ways in which the correct behavior for unliterating (especially with regard to errors) was unclear. I have several cases which ghc, hugs and Haskell 98 have differing opinions on! The Report as it stands is far from a clear and complete specification (and I didn't find anything in the Haskell' wiki/trac about literate haskell).
Hmm, some of this came up around the time the revised report was being written:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell/2001-December/008549.html http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell/2001-December/008550.html
but oddly doesn't seem to have been clarified in the report. We should definitely make sure that Haskell' does so!
Or perhaps we should get rid of \begin{code} and \end{code}, before someone proposes <code> and </code>.