4 Mar
2010
4 Mar
'10
4:21 p.m.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Neil Brown
CML is indeed the library that has the most markedly different behaviour. In Haskell, the CML package manages to produce timings like this for fairly simple benchmarks:
%GC time 96.3% (96.0% elapsed)
I knew from reading the code that CML's implementation would do something like this, although I do wonder if it triggers some pathological case in the GC.
That result is peculiar. What are you doing to the library, and what do you expect happens? Since I have some code invested on top of CML, I'd like to gain a little insight if possible. -- J.