On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:23:02 -1000 (HST)
Tim Newsham
How about STM? It would be nice if I didn't have to scan the paper each time I do something with STM. Isn't that the point of having an API reference?
-Brent
Tim Newsham http://www.thenewsh.com/~newsham/
What is missing in STM's documentation? TArray, TChan, TMVar have just as much documentation as their non-transactional counterparts. The documentation for TVar and STM is also available, but perhaps more difficult to find. Note that Control.Concurrent.STM.TVar (similarly Control.Monad.STM) does not have any documentation on the page, but each identifier is a link to GHC specific modules that give more documentation. This is a bug in Haddock: it doesn't know how to include documentation from another package. Cheers, Spencer Janssen Documentation: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/stm/Control-Concurrent... http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/GHC-Conc.html#t%3... http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/stm/Control-Monad-STM.... http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/GHC-Conc.html#t%3... etc.