28 Feb
2008
28 Feb
'08
12:25 a.m.
At Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:13:46 -0000, Claus Reinke wrote:
i got the impression that accessing freetype2 via ftgl might make things slightly easier, while also offering more options (geometry instead of texture fonts), or did I misread?
It appears to be written in C++, which makes it hard to bind to from Haskell. I did not see any C bindings for it (though, I probably did not look too hard). So, given the choice of writing a C binding for it so I could call it from Haskell, or just reimplementing it in Haskell, I opted for the latter -- and got neither done :) j.