Robert Dockins wrote:
On Apr 12, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
Well, if you get an "ambiguous type variable" error, you probably (I think) need to add some type annotations. For example:
class Foo a where foo :: a bar :: a -> String
Evaluating bar foo will result in an error, but bar (foo :: Integer) will work just fine. ____________________
The problem is that I get an incoming value which is a key of some sort. There's no way of knowing what type that value is supposed to be until I compare it with the schema from the above example. where I _am_ adding type annotations.
coerceIndex f (Schema _ SInt SPtr _) (r,hdl,o,hdr) = f (r::IdxInt,hdl,o,hdr) coerceIndex f (Schema _ SStr SPtr _) (r,hdl,o,hdr) = f (r::IdxPS,hdl,o,hdr)
When I try to add type annotations I get a complaint from the typechecker that says (In the case of the above example) Expected type: Integer, Inferred Type: PackedString.
Is the alternative to write different "select" methods for each key type (selectInt, selectPS, ...)? God I hope not, that would be a bit scary.
I'm not 100% sure I understand your use case, but I think you might be able to crack this by using Data.Dynamic:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Data- Dynamic.html
Or carry an instance in along with a type parameter, using existentials or GADT. Brandon Moore