
Great, I didn't know unamb! Specially the function "race" included:
race :: IOhttp://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/base/4.5.0.0/doc/html/System-IO....a
->
IOhttp://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/base/4.5.0.0/doc/html/System-IO....a
->
IOhttp://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/base/4.5.0.0/doc/html/System-IO....a
Race two actions against each other in separate threads, and pick whichever
finishes first. See also
ambhttp://hackage.haskell.org/package/unamb-0.2.5/docs/Data-Unamb.html#v:amb.
Could it be used to build a watchdog? Simply by providing one of the two
arguments as an action that waits and then gives a default value.
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Erik Hesselink
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Chris Warburton
wrote: Job Vranish
writes: I've often found myself wanting a function like this. It would make certain kinds of knot-tying/cycle detection _much_ easier.
Is there any reason why this function can't/shouldn't exist?
This makes me think of the more widely-known 'parallel OR' operator, which evaluates its arguments in parallel and returns whichever finishes evaluating first.
This operator cannot be implemented in Lambda Calculus, but it can in Haskell (via threads). Unfortunately Googling for 'haskell "parallel or"' brings up sentence fragments ('...parallel or concurrent...') rather than a parallel or implementation.
Perhaps you are looking for 'unamb' [0]?
Erik
[0] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/unamb _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe