On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 21:35, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
For those of us not that familiar with the iteratee library, can you provide an example of your your enumerator library is simpler? Do you mean that you have a smaller exposed API, or that it has more in-built combinators, etc.?
It has 2 exposed modules (vs 14), does not include TIFF or WAV parsers, uses [] instead of ListLike, and discards StreamChunk in favor of just "data Stream = Chunks [] | EOF". It has three dependencies (base, bytestring, transformers) rather than roughly 20. Currently mine probably has fewer built-in combinators, because it has fewer everything, but if it's missing anything somebody uses I will be happy to add it. Most of the functions available in Oleg's original code (and thus in "iteratee") appear to be for instructive purposes, rather than useful.