9 May
2007
9 May
'07
11:46 a.m.
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 10:41 +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
The way roles/traits are described in [1] (and the pages it links to) make me think of Haskell type classes. Am I completely off in doing that?
At http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2007-April/007026.html we find this passage, which sounds faintly familiar: | Now, how do roles/traits differ from interfaces? The primary | distinction is that interfaces only define behavior¹, whereas roles can | provide a dummy implementation. Dude, where's my language? -k ¹ For some value of 'behavior', apparently.