Re: [Haskell-cafe] "Assignment" in do blocks?

Looking at the nitpick list, I just remembered that there was a discussion about making let optional in do bindings a couple of years ago. https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2012-August/102741.html One of the major stumbling points was how recursive bindings should work. These these two proposals would combine nicely. adding a statement pat = exp that expresses a non-recursive let. Silvio