
Use operator precedence: infixr . I don't remember exactly how it is
used, but it should do the trick and let you get rid of the
parentheses.
2009/12/29 Jonathan Fischoff
Thirst will work I think. I tested a demo and the only problem I can see is the unwieldiness of the syntax, i.e testThirst = f `Cons` (g `Cons` (h `Cons` Nil)) Maybe there is a way to sugar up the syntax to get rid of the parentheses? On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Antoine Latter
wrote: On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Jonathan Fischoff
wrote: Hi, I would to create a list of tuples (or something similar) of invertible functions [((a -> b), (b -> a)), ((b -> c), (c -> b)), .... Such that I could call forward invertibleFuctionList domainValue = ? -- composite all the functions backward invertibleFuctionList rangeValue = forward (reverse invertibleFuctionList) rangeValue -- or something similar
I would also like to concat them. This sounds like a job for GADT that someone might have already tackled. Any ideas?
It looks like the thrist package should help you out:
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/thrist
You could define some sort of type Iso:
data Iso a b = Iso (a -> b) (b -> a)
And then build a Thrist and fold over it, the functions forward and backwards can both be implemented with right-folds.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-- Eugene Kirpichov Web IR developer, market.yandex.ru