Re: [Haskell-cafe] Cmdargs and common flags

{-# OPTIONS_GHC -fno-warn-missing-fields #-} That's what I did in my CmdArgs test suite - if you have all your CmdArgs bit in a separate file then missing this warning will be fine. I don't know of any way to rewrite the code to indicate to GHC that you know what you are doing. Thanks, Neil On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 19:11, Neil Mitchell wrote:

...

Hi Magnus,

...

Finally, you can switch to the pure annotations. I will document them shortly and give an example in System.Console.CmdArgs.Implicit, but for now the details can be found at http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/cmdargs/0.6.7/doc/html/System-Co...

I've added more details in: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/cmdargs/0.6.8/doc/html/System-Co... http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/cmdargs/0.6.8/doc/html/System-Co...

The first link includes comparisons for pure/impure, and the second gives a set of equivalences for converting between the two forms.

Thanks, Neil

I noticed that the form "record Ctor {} [...]" leads to a warning that Ctor isn't initialised.  The obvious way to remove the warning is to call the constructor with all the arguments, but is there a more convenient/terse way of achieving the same?

/M

-- Magnus Therning                      OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus@therning.org   jabber: magnus@therning.org twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus