20 Feb
2009
20 Feb
'09
10:41 a.m.
Hello Achim, Friday, February 20, 2009, 6:25:31 PM, you wrote:
it was done in order to simplify sources. are you really believe that ghc needs more than 1 millisecond to print one number? :)
Well, I know that (Show a) is about as slow as you can get.
yes, but it's printed only once against 10^9 computations -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com