
19 Dec
2006
19 Dec
'06
5:54 p.m.
Pattern matching goes back to Burstall and Darlington's work in the 1970's. As for "x:xs", the "xs" is meant to be the plural of "x", and is pronounced "exs" (I guess...). Similarly, "n:ns" is one n followed by many more "ens". Make sense? (By the way, ":" is often pronounced "followed by".) -Paul Hudak Toby Hutton wrote:
Hi,
This may have been asked before, sorry if so. I've wondered where the convention of pattern matching a list to (x:xs) came from? I've read a couple of old papers recently which let me believe it may have started back in the '70s with Miranda and its ilk.
Does anyone know why (x:xs)? Is xs meant to be a synonym for 'excess'?
Yours curiously, Toby.