Henning Thielemann
Achim Schneider schrieb:
Step 2: Determine the winner by polling preferences, same-level preference (ambivalence) allowed (eg. place 1 for logos C and D, place 2 for A and place 3 for B)
We recently had to vote for the new design of our university's website. This was done by asking every voter for an order of preference, with no equal preferences allowed. However, when the maintainer of the voting system was asked, how these answers are processed, he didn't know an answer. I think he finally converted positions to scores and added them. However, I suspect in chosing the scores for each position, he had an essential influence of the outcome of the election.
I intended to sum up all scaled preferences for every logo, and take the smallest one as the winner. "Scaled" meaning that every voter, in the end, had the same total points to distribute... like in your system. I like mine because it shifts the calculation burden from the voter to the program doing the processing. A vote of all 10's would be equivalent to a vote of all ones, and a vote of just one one would be equivalent to a vote of one one and the rest two's. -- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting, performance and/or quoting of this signature prohibited.