Johann Höchtl
In a presentation of Guy Steele for ICFP 2009 in Edinburgh: http://www.vimeo.com/6624203 he "considers foldl and foldr" harmful as they hinder parallelism because of "Process first element, then the rest" Instead he proposes a divide and merge aproach, especially in the light of going parallel.
In Haskell foldl/foldr apply to linked lists (or lazy streams, if you prefer) which are already inherently sequential, and gets a rather harsh treatment. I notice he points to finger trees, which I though was implemented in Data.Sequence.
are somewhat geared towards Fortress, but I wonder what Haskellers have to say about his position.
Can we (easily) parallelize operations on Data.Sequence? Often, the devil is in the details, and there's a lot of ground to cover between 'trees are easier to parallelize' to an efficient and effective high level interface. (E.g. non-strict semantics allowing speculative evalutaion - you still need to insert manual `par`s, right?) -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants