hi Bulat,
shortly :
with GPL you have to make your code GPL if it uses GPLed code.
with LGPL you dont have to make your code LGPL/GPL if it only links
against LGPLed library.
regards,
mt
2006/6/21, Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Jerzy,
Wednesday, June 21, 2006, 4:32:40 PM, you wrote:
one possibly interesting variant of these "strict Haskell" can be Clean language - it's also lazy by default, afaik, but contains better features to specify strictness, compiler that generates fast code (at the level of OCaml/jhc), plus IDE with GUI libs. comparing to Haskell, it seems somewhat like "Visual Basic" comparing to plain Basic. again, i don't tried it (and it's not free, afair), so look yourself.
... You will find that Clean IS FREE under LGPL, although commercial versions exist as well.
can you write more about Clean, about experience with it? i don't know exact LGPL rules - can it be used to develop commercial software and which parts (if any) is omitted in LGPL version?
it will be very interesting to hear about Clean programming environment comparing with well-known RADs - .NET, Eclipse, Delphi? can you enlighten me?
-- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe