17 Jul
2010
17 Jul
'10
10:42 p.m.
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010, wren ng thornton wrote:
Niemeijer, R.A. wrote:
Here's my take on the new design:
Screenshot: http://imgur.com/9LHvk.jpg Live version: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/623671/haskell_platform_redesign/index.htm
Is it just me, or does aligning [OSX,Win,Linux] `zip` [Comprehensive, Robust, CuttingEdge] send the wrong message...
I found it rather conspicuous that all three of the items listed under "cutting edge" (multicore parallelism, thread sparks, and transactional memory) fell into concurrency/parallelism category. I'm not saying it's a problem, or that I have a better idea, but are we conscious that we're doing it, and is it what we want? Friendly, --Lane