Call for Papers ICFP 2009: International Conference on Functional Programming Edinburgh, Scotland, 31 August - 2 September 2009 http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~gmh/icfp09.html ** Submission deadline: 2 March 2009 ** (submission deadline is earlier than usual) ICFP 2009 seeks original papers on the art and science of functional programming. Submissions are invited on all topics from principles to practice, from foundations to features, from abstraction to application. The scope includes all languages that encourage functional programming, including both purely applicative and imperative languages, as well as languages with objects or concurrency. Particular topics of interest include * Language Design: type systems; concurrency and distribution; modules; components and composition; metaprogramming; relations to object-oriented or logic programming; interoperability * Implementation: abstract machines; compilation; compile-time and run-time optimization; memory management; multi-threading; exploiting parallel hardware; interfaces to foreign functions, services, components or low-level machine resources * Software-Development Techniques: algorithms and data structures; design patterns; specification; verification; validation; proof assistants; debugging; testing; tracing; profiling * Foundations: formal semantics; lambda calculus; rewriting; type theory; monads; continuations; control; state; effects * Transformation and Analysis: abstract interpretation; partial evaluation; program transformation; program calculation; program proof * Applications and Domain-Specific Languages: symbolic computing; formal-methods tools; artificial intelligence; systems programming; distributed-systems and web programming; hardware design; databases; XML processing; scientific and numerical computing; graphical user interfaces; multimedia programming; scripting; system administration; security; education * Functional Pearls: elegant, instructive, and fun essays on functional programming The conference also solicits Experience Reports, which are short papers that provide evidence that functional programming really works or describe obstacles that have kept it from working in a particular application. What's different this year? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * The conference dates and the submission deadline are about one month earlier than usual. * Special 'Call for Experience Reports' page, suitable as a target for posts on blogs and social networks to reach practitioners who wouldn't normally think about submitting to a conference. If you have a blog, etc., please help by pointing your readers to: http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~apt/icfp09_cfer.html Instructions for authors ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ By Monday, 2 March 2009, 20:00 UTC, submit an abstract of at most 300 words and a full paper of at most 12 pages (4 pages for an Experience Report), including bibliography and figures. The deadline will be strictly enforced and papers exceeding the page limits will be summarily rejected. Authors have the option to attach supplementary material to a submission, on the understanding that reviewers may choose not to look at it. A submission will be evaluated according to its relevance, correctness, significance, originality, and clarity. It should explain its contributions in both general and technical terms, clearly identifying what has been accomplished, explaining why it is significant, and comparing it with previous work. The technical content should be accessible to a broad audience. Functional Pearls and Experience Reports are separate categories of papers that need not report original research results and must be marked as such at the time of submission. Detailed guidelines on both categories are below. Each submission must adhere to SIGPLAN's republication policy, as explained on the web. Violation risks summary rejection of the offending submission. Proceedings will be published by ACM Press. Authors of accepted submissions are expected to transfer the copyright to ACM. Presentations will be videotaped and released online if the presenter consents by signing an additional permission form at the time of the presentation. Released videos will be included along with the conference proceedings in the ACM Digital Library and may also be placed on a host such as YouTube or Google Video. Formatting: ~~~~~~~~~~~ Submissions must be in PDF format printable in black and white on US Letter sized paper and interpretable by Ghostscript. If this requirement is a hardship, make contact with the program chair at least one week before the deadline. ICFP proceedings are printed in black and white. It is permissible to include color in a submission, but you risk annoying reviewers who will have to decide if your final paper will be understandable without it. Papers must adhere to the standard ACM conference format: two columns, nine-point font on a ten-point baseline, with columns 20pc (3.33in) wide and 54pc (9in) tall, with a column gutter of 2pc (0.33in). A suitable document template for LaTeX is available from SIGPLAN. Submission: ~~~~~~~~~~~ Submissions will be accepted electronically at a URL to be named later. The deadline is set in Coordinated Universal Time. The world clock (http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=3&day=2&year=2009&hour=20&min=0&sec=0&p1=0) can give you the equivalent in your local time, e.g., Noon Monday in Seattle, 3:00 PM Monday in New York, 8:00 PM Monday in London, 5:00 AM Tuesday in Tokyo. Citation: ~~~~~~~~~ We recommend (but do not require) that you put your citations into author-date form. This procedure makes your paper easier to review. For example, if you cite a result on testing as ``(Claessen and Hughes 2000)'', many reviewers will recognize the result instantly. On the other hand, if you cite it as ``[4]'', even the best-informed reviewer has to page through your paper to find the reference. By using author-date form, you enable a knowledgeable reviewer to focus on content, not arbitrary numbering of references. LaTeX users can simply use the natbib package along with the plainnat bibliography style. In practice, this means putting \usepackage{natbib} \bibpunct();A{}, \let\cite=\citep in your LaTeX preamble, and \bibliographystyle{plainnat} in your document. For most citations you will use the \cite command; if you want a citation like ``Claessen and Hughes (2000) showed that...'' you should use something like ``\citet{claessen:quickcheck} showed...'' Alternatively, the McBride bibliography style, which adheres to the Chicago manual of style ``Documentation Two'' specifications and which fixes some perceived deficiencies of natbib, may be used. The style file along with instructions for using it is available on the McBride web site. Author response: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Authors will have a 48-hour period, starting at 20:00 UTC on 21 April 2009, to read and respond to reviews. Special categories of papers ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In addition to research papers, ICFP solicits two kinds of papers that do not require original research contributions: Functional Pearls, which are full papers, and Experience Reports, which are limited to four pages. Authors submitting such papers may wish to consider the following advice. Functional Pearls ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A Functional Pearl is an elegant essay about something related to functional programming. It might offer: * a new and thought-provoking way of looking at an old idea * an instructive example of program calculation or proof * a nifty presentation of an old or new data structure * an interesting application of functional programming techniques * a novel use or exposition of functional programming in the classroom Functional Pearls are not restricted to the above varieties, however. While pearls often demonstrate an idea through the development of a short program, there is no requirement or expectation that they do so. Thus, they encompass the notions of theoretical and educational pearls. Functional Pearls are valued as highly and judged as rigorously as ordinary papers, but using somewhat different criteria. In particular, a pearl is not required to report original research. However, it should be concise, instructive, and entertaining. Your pearl is likely to be rejected if your readers get bored, if the material gets too complicated, if too much specialized knowledge is needed, or if the writing is inelegant. The key to writing a good pearl is polishing. A submission you wish to have treated as a pearl must be marked as such on the submission web page, and should contain the words ``Functional Pearl'' somewhere in its title or subtitle. These steps will alert reviewers to use the appropriate evaluation criteria. However, pearls will be combined with ordinary papers for the purpose of computing the conference's acceptance rate. Experience Reports ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The purpose of an Experience Report is to help create a body of published, refereed, citable evidence that functional programming really works---or to describe what obstacles prevent it from working. Possible topics for an Experience Report include, but are not limited to: * insights gained from real-world projects using functional programming * comparison of functional programming with conventional programming in the context of an industrial project or a university curriculum * project-management, business, or legal issues encountered when using functional programming in a real-world project * curricular issues encountered when using functional programming in education * real-world constraints that created special challenges for an implementation of a functional language or for functional programming in general An Experience Report is distinguished from a normal ICFP paper by its title, by its length, and by the criteria used to evaluate it. * Both in the proceedings and in any citations, the title of each accepted Experience Report must begin with the words ``Experience Report'' followed by a colon. The acceptance rate for Experience Reports will be computed and reported separately from the rate for ordinary papers. * An Experience Report is at most 4 pages long. Each accepted Experience Report will be presented at the conference, but depending on the number of Experience Reports and regular papers accepted, authors of Experience reports may be asked to give shorter talks. * Because the purpose of Experience Reports is to enable our community to accumulate a body of evidence about the efficacy of functional programming, an acceptable Experience Report need not add to the body of knowledge of the functional-programming community by presenting novel results or conclusions. It is sufficient if the Report states a clear thesis and provides supporting evidence. The thesis must be relevant to ICFP, but it need not be novel. The program committee will accept or reject Experience Reports based on whether they judge the evidence to be convincing. Anecdotal evidence will be acceptable provided it is well argued and the author explains what efforts were made to gather as much evidence as possible. Typically, more convincing evidence is obtained from papers which show how functional programming was used than from papers which only say that functional programming was used. The most convincing evidence often includes comparisons of situations before and after the introduction or discontinuation of functional programming. Evidence drawn from a single person's experience may be sufficient, but more weight will be given to evidence drawn from the experience of groups of people. An Experience Report should be short and to the point: make a claim about how well functional programming worked on your project and why, and produce evidence to substantiate your claim. If functional programming worked for you in the same ways it has worked for others, you need only to summarize the results---the main part of your paper should discuss how well it worked and in what context. Most readers will not want to know all the details of your project and its implementation, but please characterize your project and its context well enough so that readers can judge to what degree your experience is relevant to their own projects. Be especially careful to highlight any unusual aspects of your project. Also keep in mind that specifics about your project are more valuable than generalities about functional programming; for example, it is more valuable to say that your team delivered its software a month ahead of schedule than it is to say that functional programming made your team more productive. If your paper not only describes experience but also presents new technical results, or if your experience refutes cherished beliefs of the functional-programming community, you may be better off submitting it as a full paper, which will be judged by the usual criteria of novelty, originality, and relevance. If you are unsure in which category to submit, the program chair will be happy to help you decide. Other information ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Conference Chair ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Graham Hutton (University of Nottingham) Program Chair ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Andrew Tolmach Department of Computer Science Portland State University P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207 USA Email: apt@cs.pdx.edu Phone: +1 503 725 5492 Fax: +1 503 725 3211 Mail sent to the address above is filtered for spam. If you send mail and do not receive a prompt response, particularly if the deadline is looming, feel free to telephone. Program Committee ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Amal Ahmed (Toyota Technological Institute, Chicago) Maria Alpuente (Technical University of Valencia (UPV)) Lennart Augustsson (Standard Chartered Bank) Lars Birkedal (IT University of Copenhagen) Manuel Chakravarty (University of New South Wales) Koen Claessen (Chalmers University of Technology) Marc Feeley (Universite de Montreal) Andrzej Filinski (University of Copenhagen) Daan Leijen (Microsoft Research) Xavier Leroy (INRIA Paris-Rocquencourt) Conor McBride (University of Strathclyde) Matthew Might (University of Utah) Shin-Cheng Mu (Academia Sinica) Atsushi Ohori (Tohoku University) Kristoffer Rose (IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center) Important Dates (at 20:00 UTC) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Submission: 2 March 2009 Author response: 21-23 April 2009 Notification: 5 May 2009 Final papers due: 8 June 2009 ICFP 2009 Web Site ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~gmh/icfp09.html Special Journal Issue ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ There will be a special issue of the Journal of Functional Programming with papers from ICFP 2009. The program committee will invite the authors of select accepted papers to submit a journal version to this issue.