30 Jun
2006
30 Jun
'06
10:45 a.m.
Hello Krasimir, Friday, June 30, 2006, 2:26:53 PM, you wrote:
In the last section you said that IO has the same definition in GHC and Hugs. As far as I can remember in Hugs IO is defined as:
newtype IO a = IO ((a -> IOResult) -> (IOError -> IOResult) -> IOResult)
Of course this definition is builtin and cann't be seen in the Haskell source code.
i'm not sure about this - can this be considered as an example of this RealWorld strategy or not. Feel free to edit text if you know the right answer -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com