[Haskell-cafe] Re: unsafeInterleaveIO respecting order of actions

"Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" wrote:

On 2009 Jan 1, at 20:08, David Menendez wrote:

...

On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Achim Schneider wrote:

...

There are no lazy monads. Monads imply explicit sequencing...

Huh? How are you defining "lazy monad"?

We've had this discussion before; somewhere in the archives is an example of a State monad doing things in data-driven order instead of the apparently "explicit" monadic sequencing. Monads don't insure sequencing unless designed to do so (as, for example, IO).

The more I try to put stuff into words, the more I part from lambda calculus into the regions of syntactical pitfalls. Therefore, I'm just going to shut up. -- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting, performance and/or quoting of this signature prohibited.