Alberto Ruiz-2 wrote:
The GSL has been ported to Windows:
http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/gsl.htm
so I think that GSLHaskell could also be adapted to work in Windows... I will try to do it.
Alberto
On Monday 24 July 2006 02:56, SevenThunders wrote:
GSL Haskell bindings:
http://dis.um.es/~alberto/GSLHaskell/ http://dis.um.es/~alberto/GSLHaskell/doc/
Specifically for Linary Algebra: http://dis.um.es/~alberto/GSLHaskell/doc/GSL-Base.html
You make a good point and the decision was by no means cut and dry.
However
I made a point of developing some test code using some the newer array
data
types and looked at maintaining the array in Haskell and then
Jared Updike wrote: directly
calling Blas etc. I even had a nice polymorphic matrix class going. However I found the array interface just a bit too 'clunky' to use a technical term. The withArray interface is not very appealing. The
layers
of lambda notation was giving me a headache.
I think part of the problem here is not necessarily C or Haskell's fault, but rather that what you were trying to do was write a library (or needed the right library). Library writing is hard enough on its own, much less when one is relatively new to Haskell! Hopefully you will find the right tool for the job and things will go well!
Jared. -- http://www.updike.org/~jared/ reverse ")-:" _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
I looked at that. It would have been nice to use it however it seems to have issues on Windows. Although my windows requirement probably could have been relaxed, at the beginning of the project our network was entirely windows based.
Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Fantastic, this is significant news. Of course its a bit late in my case, but it will still probably be very helpful for follow on work. I'll try to make it possible to interchange data between my engine and GSL. It might be interesting to compare performance. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Why-Haskell--tf1986013.html#a5463325 Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe forum at Nabble.com.