Hello Claus, Friday, August 3, 2007, 5:12:26 PM, you wrote:
can you please rewrite *p++=*q++ in haskell? do { w p =<< r q; i p; i q }
how about *Object.File.Line.CurPtr++ = *AnotherObject.File.Line.CurPtr++ ? ;)
but whatever line-noise one prefers, this still seems a call for better combinators in the standard libs, rather than a call for more syntax.
the problem with Haskell is that we need to split C expression into several statements and explicitly specify execution order even when we know that it doesn't matter. ideally, it should be possible to define ++x = modifyIORef x (+1) >> readIORef x *x = readIORef x and know that ghc will automatically generate temporary variables for results of monadic operations, understand the code and optimize it the sole reason why it's required for me is writing imperative software. while some purists may believe that haskell doesn't need imperative code, it's part of my program/libs and i want to have simple and concise representation for it -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com