On 11/18/05, Tomasz Zielonka
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 06:56:09PM +0100, Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
Some people do use it more often than I do, but I find that in most cases except simple "pipelined" functions it only makes the code harder to read.
But this case is quite important, isn't it?
I'm not so sure it is, and you can almost always write it using ($) without too much trouble. I really only ever use (.) for pretty simple things like filter (not . null). Again. I'm thinking (<>) is a good operator. An intelligent editor would pull them together a bit more to make it look even more like a ring. I could see myself using <> and >< for dot and cross products in linear algebra, though, but I'm willing to sacrifice those operators for the greater good :-) /S -- Sebastian Sylvan +46(0)736-818655 UIN: 44640862