16 Jan
2006
16 Jan
'06
3:43 p.m.
the Ackermann benchmark, it's very good for C that
--- Daniel Fischer
chose 9 and not a larger value? For 10, we are significantly faster and for 11,12,13, we can run rings around the C-programme
homepage: "understand that the faster program may become the slower program when the workload changes" Maybe when there's a working version of this, it'll turn out to be the faster program http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/debian/benchmark.php?test=ackermann&lang=ghc&id=0 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com